Compare Best No Load Mutual Funds Before You Invest!
In their search for the best no load mutual fund, the trend amongst investors is to compare funds and base their decision on the fees charged by the fund and the expense ratio. No load mutual funds are those on which there are no commission or sales charges when you buy shares of these funds. Thus, all the money that you are investing actually goes on to be invested by the mutual fund, unlike load mutual funds, where the broker retains a certain percentage of the fund as their fees. In fact, some of the best no load mutual funds are found to have outperformed their load counterparts in the last three years. This can be determined by using one of the tools available to research and compare no load mutual funds.
Many investors are under a false impression that if the fund charges a fee, it will yield better returns, and that such fees are charged by the fund so that serious investors remain in that exclusive club of people who earn higher returns on their investments. Nothing can be further from truth, in fact, there are many no load mutual funds that have outperformed mutual funds with loads, and have provided greater returns to their investors. It has been observed that most often it is the brokers who are responsible for creating such false impressions on people's minds. They are more likely to recommend a fund with a fee, or might even push you to buy such funds. The reason for such behavior is fairly simple. The broker who takes care of the deal between you and a mutual fund company, for a fund that has sales fees or load, gets a slice of this sales fee. Thus, when a broker is pitching you a fund with load, it is for his own personal benefit, rather than the returns on your investments.
A point that many investors are confused about is the difference between management fees and sales fees, or simply, loads. Management fees are those incurred by the mutual fund for running the fund. This would include salaries of people administering the fund, trading costs, redemption, exchanges etc. These are not load fees, but fees for the convenience that you have as a simpler and diversified way of investment through a mutual fund. So the fees of an actively managed fund are obviously more than those funds that are not actively managed, simply because actively managed funds incur more costs. This could be in the form of purchase fees, payable at the time of buying the fund, or redemption fees, which have to be paid when exiting a fund, or selling its shares.
As opposed to this, sales fees or load is paid to the broker and not to the fund’s management. These fees can be in the form of front-end load- to be paid at the time of buying into a fund, or back-end load- o be paid when the mutual fund is being sold. And as these fees are not available to the management team, there is no proof to show that a particular management team can provide better earnings with load funds as compared to no load funds.
|